Showing posts with label theatre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theatre. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 April 2026

Thoughts on Luke Jerram's Helios in Grimsby Minster (With other thoughts on Samuel and Samuel 'Magotty' Johnson)



Luke Jerram’s Helios art piece recently went to Grimsby Minster and I went along to have a look.


It consists of a large inflatable sun, positioned in the crosspiece of the church, just down from the high altar. It glows with light, has moving sunspots and textures projected on it and a soundtrack. The image of the Sun is made from photographs, put together to create a realistic image of how the Sun actually is. The promotional material claims that it will leave the visitor ‘completely speechless’… and it, sort of, did.


I’m a sucker for seeing something I’ve never seen before, especially if it is free and a short stroll from my house. I went through the doors of the minster and did indeed see something I have never seen before, a large, orange beachball suspended in the middle of a dim church. I read the little spiel and sat down and tried to think or feel.. something.


The first thing I thought was, ‘well, it’s something I’ve never seen before - and now I have’. Then I was confronted by my own lack of reaction. I tried to feel something about it. I was struck that the symbol for the project has a sun symbol in the word ‘helios’, and that the sun symbol has a crown of rays, the way we usually depict the Sun. It’s odd, to see the Sun as a ball. 


I went back to the spiel to see what I was missing. There was a painting of a previous Luke Jerram installation in the minster, this was a large inflatable moon. He’s also done one of the Earth and Mars. The dude really likes making inflatable celestial objects and putting them in unusual places.


Now, I love the Sun. It’s my favourite source of heat and light. I live in a country where it doesn’t (usually) scorch everything into dust and is a somewhat rare and welcome occurrence. This month has been a very sunny month and it’s been glorious (except for the fact I have to water my new turf for ages). I couldn’t connect the beachball with the Sun. Either as the metaphorical giver of light and life represented by its crown of rays, or as the literal thing my world revolves around. I just saw a beachball tethered to a ceiling. Perhaps I wasn’t in an imaginative mood, I’d painted a shed green that morning, a job which doesn’t really encourage celestial thoughts. 


So I took a silly photo of myself looking like a saint and went home.


Later on, I thought I’d turn to an old favourite, Johnson’s Dictionary to get his view on the Sun. Here’s what he had to say. 


1. The luminary that makes the day.


Doth beauty keep which never sun can burn,

Nor storms do turn?

Sidney. 


Bid her steal into the pleached bow’r,

Where honeysuckles, ripen’d by the sun,

Forbid the sun to enter.

Shakespeare. 


Though there be but one sun existing in the world, yet the idea of it being abstracted, so that more substances might each agree in it, it is as much a sort as if there were as many suns as there are stars.

Locke. 


By night, by day, from pole to pole they run;

Or from the setting seek the rising sun.

Harte. 


Perhaps the lack of heat was the source of the problem. As ‘the luminary that makes the day’, Helios glows softly in the dim, old church - it doesn’t flood it with light and heat. It’s a realistic depiction of the Sun without the Sun’s raw power. It is a sun which doesn’t burn, which will never ripen a honeysuckle and which will neither rise nor set. I’m not really sure what Locke is saying in his quote, I feel he’s saying that the Sun can be abstracted and imagined, as every star is a sun. All I can say is that Helios abstracts the Sun till it becomes a sun, lowercase, not the impressive, named thing.


Weirdly, I was ultimately brought back to a piece of writing by a different Samuel Johnson, Samuel ‘Maggoty’ Johnson, the dancing master and household fool who wrote the play, Hurlothrumbo.


I’ve looked at the script before on this blog, but to recap, it had one of the most successful runs of the eighteenth century. Maggoty Johnson was an official fool and the published play was sold on the ridiculousness of the thing. That was what made it a success, with accounts of the truly peculiar way it was staged, but I always saw a glimpse of something else in it.


The story is about a king called Soaretherial, who is so carried away by his flights of imagination that he doesn’t notice the revolution stirring in his country and aided by the very earthy Dutch king, Lomperhomock. Hurlothrumbo is the defender of the realm and he’s torn between his duty to the impractical Soaretherial and a bribe to let the Lomperhomock in. There’s also Lord Flame, a character in love with love who often plays a scene on stilts.


How much Maggoty intended a serious reading of his play, I have no idea, but there is an unrestrained pleasure and joy in the writing that, while often reading as goofy, seems to try and reach something nebulous and wonderful through it’s sheer exuberance. The king, Soaretherial is described as this by Hurlothrumbo;


   “His high-born Soul is above the Sublunary World, he reigns, he rides in the Clouds, and keeps his Court in the Horizon; He’s Emperor of the superlative Heights, and lives in Pleasure among the Gods; he plays at Bowls with the Stars, and makes a Foot-ball of the Globe; he makes that to fly far, far out of the reach of Thought.” 


There are times when the play is trying to do exactly that, fly far beyond the reach of thought (and sense). The very plot pits the abstracted celestial characters against the earthy, with both the nation and Hurlothrumbo as the battlegrounds. 


The Sun is a constant presence in the play. It’s a metaphor, but not a very controlled one, sometimes referring to Soaretherial, sometimes to God, sometimes to Lord Flame - but there is one tension about the Sun that is consistent, its life-giving and life destroying properties. Two courtiers are talking about the nature of their king and have the following exchange;


Dar. A poor King is arrived at Court, and Dologodelmo Oratorys high Encomiums upon the mighty Soarethereal, declares he’s like the glorious Sun, extends his Beams to all and every part of the World; and as he rides along the Meridian Course, every feeble Plant beneath him is cherished, and rises up revived.


Urlan. The Simile is not good: The Sun gives Life to the Plants that reside far off, but those that grow under him are burn’d, and scorch’d to Ashes.


The very abstracted, high nature of King Soaretherial means that he’s damaging to those closest to him. At another point of the play, he gathers the power of the Sun to inspire his troops to life, vigour and victory. A place where the Sun has the power of good.


One plot point has Soaretherial’s ally, the Spanish Prince Theorbeo, taken to a dreadful execution facility, ‘the house of burning glass’. There, he is to be stifled in a greenhouse and die, or possibly be physically burnt up by the refracted light. The Sun is potentially a killer, the tension mounts (sort of) until a cloud covers the Sun and Theorbeo is saved. Here, the Sun has great power which is easily mitigated.


In Hurlothrumbo, a character says, “When I gaze upon the Sun, I sink into myself, full of Humility”, while this is questionable, gazing at the Sun is more likely to cause blindness than humility, it touches something about how unimaginable the Sun is and how it takes a leap to even try to imagine it. Samuel ‘Maggoty’ Johnson, for all his faults and idiosyncrasies, really seems to engage with the Sun as something incredibly powerful, both actually and mythically. This was something Helios didn’t do, only reducing it to a beachball tethered to a roof.






 

Wednesday, 3 September 2025

"You've done this many times before"... a useful mantra from an odd place.


 “You’ve done this many times before, this is just one of those times.”

The above quote is a line spoken a number of times in Craig Warner’s theatrical adaptation of Patricia Highsmith’s novel, Strangers on a Train. It’s first said by Charles Bruno but becomes repeated by Guy Haines, a mantra between them. I’ve read the novel, but only after having read the play many times to learn the lines, I can’t find it there, it might be a play only addition.

The play version of Charles Bruno is a more pathetic person than the novel version - at the very least, his hold over Guy Haines is less strong - but the line is an example of Bruno being something of the master manipulator he thinks he is. At the point it’s introduced, he’s been sending Guy daily letters reiterating the exact steps he should take to kill Bruno’s father. The notion being that Guy has rehearsed the steps so often by reading the letters, the actual act should be no different.


Of course, if Guy had a backbone, he’d send the letters to the police and use it as proof of Bruno’s murderous intentions but he doesn’t, so he obsessively reads them instead. There is something psychologically powerful in repeating and reiterating the instructions again and again, something which makes it inevitable that Guy will follow them. It reminds me of the Roman stoics who would rehearse the worst outcomes of an event so they would be ready for them if they occurred.


It’s also an interesting line to have in a play. As someone playing Guy, I’ve read those lines multiple times, said them aloud in rehearsals and will say them over again during the play’s run. In a very real sense, when I ‘kill’ Bruno’s father on the fifth night of the run, I’ll have done it ‘for real’, (at least for an audience invested in the action) four times before. Poor Bruno’s father, he never appears on stage but is killed over and over again.


Weirdly, it’s a line that has been playing in my head a lot this week, both in reference to the play and in reference to going back to work at a school. This is my 17th new year and I find going back after the summer holidays as much as I ever did. There’s something comforting in remembering that I’ve done it many times before and that this is just one of those times. It also helps with the play, although I’ve learned the lines, I don’t feel like I have. They are all in there and come out when the scenes play, but if I were to sit down and try to cold remember them, it’s like they’re not there - but I’ve successfully got through the scenes many times before, tonight will be just one of those times. 


It also applies to my writing and this blog. A little hour snatched after school and before rehearsal is the only time I have to write this and it wasn’t till this morning that I had any idea of what I wanted to write about. I always think of something though. I’ve written a blog post many times before, this is just one of those times - I should trust myself.


And it might not be the finest entry on this blog, but it’s something, and something relevant to the art of writing and my life at this moment. It’ll do anyway.


Next week I perform the play and then after that, I won’t be doing it any more. I’ll probably miss it then.




Wednesday, 16 July 2025

'This is Me' - of course it is.


 

Yesterday, the children at the performance club of the school I work at performed a three show run of an adaptation of The Greatest Showman. I’m the second adult in the club at so the de-facto assistant director (though the work has mainly been the other adult, she’s worked hard).


I signed up to help the club because I had to help one and I like performing. It was revealed what the performance was going to be after. At this point, I’d not actually seen The Greatest Showman, so my first job was to watch it. To be honest, I think it looks incredibly cheap. There are some awful cg enhanced shots and it simply didn’t convey the fun of the fair. I also found the re-telling of PT Barnum’s life to be absolutely baffling. Barnum is an interesting person, not a good person, but an interesting one. I’ve read a little about him and some of his performers and there’s a lot to unpack in Barnum and his relationships. I can see why a feel-good musical wouldn’t want to go into some of the grislier aspects of the story but I found it absolutely baffling that the character flaw given to Barnum (a flirted infidelity with Jenny Lind) was one of the few the real Barnum didn’t have. Why didn’t they just make it generic circus guy?


I’m partial to a musical. I’ve seen many of them on stage, I’ve even nicknamed my house Calamity Jane, but I never wanted to see this one.



The reason for that is the break-out song ‘This is Me’. I don’t like songs with ‘ohs’ in them very much and I found the subject generically dull. ‘This is Me’, of course it is. Are we not in an age of dull, anodyne, brand-savvy individualism? What else could a person write a song about these days?  


One of the people I’ve watched musical most with is my sister. We also try and watch Eurovision together and, if we can’t, we message each other throughout. This year, it was noticeable how many of the songs were cookie-cutter anthems of triumph about being yourself. It got boring. I really liked Nemo’s ‘The Code’ when it won last year, but seeing their new song this year, it was clear that Nemo only has one subject for songs… that being Nemo.


The other month I read a book called ’15 Lessons in New Thought’ by Elizabeth Towne. It was written in 1923 and contained life lessons from the perspective on New Thought, a mind-over-matter spiritualist movement that birthed Christian Science and influenced ideas of manifestation like ‘The Secret’. While it was the pseudo-scientific/pseudo-spiritual mumbo-jumbo I was expecting (with a spicy hint of eugenics thrown in), I was surprised by the collective vision in it. The notion was that God is created from all the thoughts of all creation and his plan was not pre-determined but worked out by his creation, acting as nodes in his brain. If anything felt truly revolutionary in the book, it wasn’t the “your mind creates reality” bullshit, it was the notion of, “this is us”. 


“This is us” even makes better thematic sense in the musical than “this is me”, because the characters grow and become happier in themselves through the shared endeavour of putting on a show - the old Muppets formula. 


I couldn’t go into helping a production of The Greatest Showman with such a negative perspective though, I needed to find things I liked. The first thing I did was divorce the story from any true events, this was just the story of happy, handsome circus man and not any real person. I also had to acknowledge how much I enjoyed the choreography, especially in the song ‘The Other Side’ which is almost an OK Go video.


As time went on, I also started to enjoy the songs. ‘A Million Dreams’ is no ‘Rainbow Connection’ but it’s a sweet song, especially when sung by a group of forty children. The song I really started to like was ‘From Now On’. It follows a similar pattern to many songs in the show, someone starts off low, but through the power of the song ends triumphant. In this song, happy, handsome circus man has lost everything and feels like a chump for neglecting his friends and family. It begins full of the letter ‘I”. He sings about how he shall no longer be dazzled by fame and fortune. By the end of the song, all the ‘I’ has been replaced by ‘we’ and the chorus all sing how ‘we will come back home’. It was lovely to hear the ‘we’.




Wednesday, 30 October 2024

A List of Everything I Reviewed

I reviewed theatre in London for just over a year. In that time I wrote 58 reviews, which averaged out about one a week. In truth, the volume of plays came in waves.

It started with a surreal cabaret that involved cross-dressing Rasputin with a wooly willy and ended in the joke "Campanology is a great way to hang out at the weekend with big dongs."

Highs along the way included a tight horror story, a moving tale of a piano, a court masque and a three person Dickens show.

Low points included a repeated question about a mouse, a badly rehearsed thing in a tower block and tiring relationship drama with not enough aliens. 

Now I am a long way away from the bright(ish) lights and pub backrooms and, to be honest, I miss it a little. However, I am in a play - and every time I sat to review a piece of theatre, I had a yearning to be in one. 

However, for my own use more than anything else, here is a clickable list of everything I reviewed in that time. 


The play I am in is One Man, Two Guvnors at the Caxton Theatre. I play one of the guvnors, Stanley Stubbers, and you can find more about that here.











Wednesday, 28 August 2024

Review: The Recruiting Officer at The Stamford Shakespeare Company

 The Stamford Shakespeare Company are an institution in the local area. Founded in the sixties, various machinations have meant they are in the very enviable position of having a permanent theatre, quite a coup for an amateur company. More than this, it’s an outdoor venue (pre-dating Regent’s Park’s outdoor theatre) in an area of pretty gardens and an oldish building, Tolethorpe Hall, as the backdrop. 



Judging by the costuming and set design, they may also be one of the most solvent amateur theatre groups in the country - last year I saw The Woman in the Van, a production that included three vans. In my time reviewing productions over the last year and a half, I reckon the Stamford Shakespeare Company are richer than most professional companies. 


It creates a strange, quite magical and very English phenomenon. On a performance level it involves amateur acting (though often very good amateur acting), supported by more-than professional budget in an event that is a centrepiece for the local area. 


What happens is, the great and the good (and the wannabe or thinktheyare great and good) from Rutland, Cambridgeshire, the posh bits of Lincolnshire, like the Deepings and such, all congregate on this manor house and gardens. There they park their cars (ours was parked near small gravestones for ‘Gypsy’ and a number of other cats) and carry picnics through to the grounds. My mum is a powerful picnic maker, but even her efforts are dwarfed by people who bring chairs, tables, tablecloths, flowers in vases, candles in candle holders, silver cutlery…it’s a heaven for Hyacinth Buckets. 


After this elaborate feast, the picnics are packed up and the people are called to the auditorium, inside for the audience, outside for the performers. The stage is ringed by bushes and trees and there is usually an elaborate set, sometimes with multiple levels. We went to see George Farquhar’s The Recruiting Officer. There were shops on one side with a shambles and fruit stall that was also accessible on a higher level. Behind was a simpler ‘house’ set and a full standing market hall. Coming up are a full cast in period dress, a little clumsy swordfighting, a bunch of jokes - some of them working, some of them not, and a folk band.


I’ve been to see the Stamford Shakespeare Company a number of times - although, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen the Shakespeare, that’s usually earlier in the summer than when I visit. There have been some very good plays, the newer ones I’ve found the best, particularly The Lady in the Van. However, the play is definitely just one part of the wider experience. This would likely be my last chance to visit though and I was pleased it was coinciding with an 18th century piece.


I thought The Recruiting Officer quite a bold choice for a company most comfortable in Shakespeare, Wilde and Noel Coward. Eighteenth Century stuff simply doesn’t have the cultural ubiquity to make it easy to approach as a performer or an audience, lacking the prestige of earlier theatre and relatability of newer. This is especially true of Farquhar’s work, coming at the beginning of the century and essentially being the last gasp of restoration ‘humours’ comedy.


In the backdrop of the recent successes of the War of Spanish Succession, a group of grenadiers come to recruit for their regiment in the mostly sleepy town of Shrewsbury. The main recruiter is Sergeant Kite, a man perfectly suited for recruiting work because of his full list of vices. He’s perfectly happy to flim-flam, trick or bully a person into the service for the commission he will get. At one point he even poses as a fortune teller, in order to get the people of the town to accept the army as their fate.


His commander is Captain Plume, well loved of the town and its magistrate, he’s also beloved of his daughter until her older brother dies and she is now worth much more. Will she (or more importantly, her father) settle for a simple captain now. In a similar position is Squire Worthy, his beloved, Melinda, has also come into some money and is using that to punish him for his presumptions towards her during their early courtship. To add to his problems, he has a rival suitor in Captain Brazen, an extravagant fop.


One of the historical elements that I was most excited about was that The George, the hotel I stayed at during my earlier successful trip to Lichfield and my recent unsuccessful one, claimed to be the place Farquhar stayed when he was himself a recruiting officer and the inn and town were inspiration for a number of plays including The Recruiting Officer. How distressing then, that the play says it takes place in Shrewsbury. However, there is a reference to watching the clocks of the churches of St Mary’s and St Chads - both Lichfield churches. Indeed, Samuel Johnson was to be baptised there a couple of years after the play was performed.One of Davey Garrick’s first productions was an amateur production of The Recruiting Officer, in which he gave himself a plum role.


Talking of plum roles, Colley Cibber had a huge hit with his take on Captain Brazen, the outré fop, but fops were his speciality. I really need to write a bit more about him and his fascinating family at some point.


As for the 2024 performance at Tolethorpe, how was it?


One problem with an old comedy is not spotting the jokes that are right there, the other is creating jokes out of nothing. This production was guilty of both these sins. There was a particularly modern elision of the camp inherent in the fop character and homosexuality. Not that there wasn’t a little of that then, but it was an era where men did sometimes wear makeup and often had high heel shoes and ribbons and such. It was fashionable to speak in a fop-talk and lard as many foreign phrases as possible. Really the fop should be understood as closer to hipster or something of that ilk - and to have him cop a feel of Captain Plume whenever possible doesn’t really understand what a fop was. 


What’s more, there were an awful lot of “gay..hehehe” jokes for a modern production. I suppose the audience at Tolethorpe skews old and such Are You Being Served jokes still land well - but a younger or more metropolitan audience would have been perplexed at the attempts to create laughs out of gay panic. Jokes that weren’t really in the text. There were the misunderstandings of ‘the fop’ as a character, but there was also a lot of misunderstanding of how common it was for people to bunk up together. That the soldiers shared beds wasn’t a terrible indication of gayness in the military, simply a reflection on poor pay and limited bed space.


It was also one of the more indifferently directed plays I’ve seen there. A lot of clumped blocking, not very good use of a large stage, with people in tight areas throughout. The sword fight and the pistol duel weren’t really maximised for comedy or suspense. There was a scene with a man hiding under a table during a crystal ball reading that felt like it had a lot of potential on the stage (such as the table leaping about the stage as the crystal ball reader says its possessed) that didn’t fully cohere in the cramped tent set they were using. 


There was a very good scene involving lots of innuendo about breasts of chickens and the breasts of the chicken seller, and the comic pairing of Costar and Tom was very good. I also enjoyed the performance of Brazen, who had the theatricality of the fop down pat, especially the way Brazen fumbles for a heightened elegance he never quite reaches. 


I had a lot of pleasure going to see The Recruiting Officer and I’m sorry I probably won’t get to be going to see the Stamford Shakespeare Company for a while. If you want to experience something very unique, next year they are playing it safe with two Shakespeares and an Oscar Wilde.