Wednesday, 24 September 2025

On Big Books

 Did you know, I’m into books? I like them a lot. I like collecting them, I like organising them, I like reading them, I like thinking about them after I’ve read them - I write about them, sometimes I even write them. This often leads to the assumption that I find the bigger a book is, the better. This is not necessarily true.


I have read big books and there are definitely larger books I’ve enjoyed, The Essays of Michel de Montaigne is a reading experience I found difficult but also very rewarding which grows the more I think about it and leads me to want to read it again. The same is true of Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy. My favourite novel, Tom Jones is rather long, but it never feels it. At least, not till Tom gets to London. 


Often I’ve found big books do not always have the full bang for their buck. I’m glad I read all of Clarissa and I can now appreciate the positive impact it had on literature and the interesting realistic and psychological things it attempted but I shall probably never return to it.


Nor do I expect to return to Ducks Newburyport, despite how fascinating it was to try and tease out an organisational and thematic principle. Les Miserables was a book that seems to be diminished by its size, the sheer onslaught of everything leading to no set-piece or character standing out. I know others would disagree, citing the chase in the sewers or the manning of the barricade, but imagine a smaller book where one of those big moments was the central moment and I think it would be a stronger book.


That’s not to say all big books are bad. Dickens is at his best when he has the space to stretch out and be truly Dickens, Hard Times being easily the weakest of his works I’ve read. Anna Karenina also has this wonderful quality of exactly as long as it needs to be, I wonder if War and Peace feels the same. Ulysses is reportedly a book that improves on reread and, having enjoyed it the first time, I can see how having a clearer expectation of the journey ahead, it would be more enjoyable. I’ve certainly found that every time I’ve reread the equally idiosyncratic Tristram Shandy. I’d like to read Middlemarch again, I wonder if I’d find it as alienating as I did the first time.


One book I can’t ever imagine reading again is Proust’s In Search of Lost Time. While there were certainly moments and characters I enjoyed, and the peculiarly meditative style had a way of separating Proust time from normal time, I did find it something of a wet fart. Maybe it was the translation. I couldn’t read Don Quixote till I found a translation that slipped down easily enough. 


I tend to tackle two big beasts a year, one in the summer and one near Christmas. This summer’s book is The Tale of Genji by Murasaki Shikibu. While there are books I’ve split up over a year (Pamela, Montaigne and Lost Time) I tend to tackle the big book in the August holiday. This holiday I was finishing the settlement of my new house and learning/rehearsing the main part in a play and I simply didn’t get much of anything read. This means that after two months, I am yet to break halfway through Genji.


It’s one of those books which make it hard to carry around everywhere and pull out whenever. The book itself is physically large, fat and floppy, heavy if propped up on a chest or belly. It’s simply too cumbersome to sit in the park with and to throw it in a bag to grab at moments at school would be to leave no room for my raincoat or lunch. What’s more, the long chapters, detailed intricacies of courtly life and multiple characters (all without names) mean that it can’t be understood in small chunks either. Yet neither can it be read in big chunks, as too much Genji is a cosh and you find yourself asleep and dribbling before you know it. 


This is not to say Genji is unenjoyable, and it’s not boring, but it has a dreamy meditative quality, not unlike Proust, that means it’s simply not a book to be gobbled in large chunks. It’s one of those occasions where there is no solution but patience, read thirty or forty pages and night and watch it slowly be nibbled away. Now the play is over, the house settled and a nice routine has been established I am enjoying my time with Genji, entering this expansive world and life so different to mine and watch the scroll of his life gently unwind. I am looking forward to necking a few short, intense novels when I get done though.

Wednesday, 17 September 2025

Rest

I've been very busy with plays and school, so I'm having a rest from the blog this week.

4. Quiet; peace; cessation from disturbance.Learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in heart; and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
Mat. xi. 29. 
He giveth you rest from all your enemies.
Deut. xii. 10. 
Though the righteous be prevented with death; yet shall he be in rest.
Wisd. iv. 7. 
’Scap’d from such storms of pow’r, holding it best
To be below herself to be at rest.
Daniel’s Civil War. 
The root cut off, from whence these tumults rose,
He should have rest, the commonwealth repose.
Daniel.
Thus fenc’d, but not at rest or ease of mind.
Milton. 
With what a load of vengeance am I prest,
Yet never, never, can I hope for rest;
For when my heavy burden I remove,
The weight falls down, and crushes her I love.
Dryden. 
Like the sun, it had light and agility; it knew no rest but in motion, no quiet but in activity.
South’s Sermons. 
Where can a frail man hide him? in what arms
Shall a short life enjoy a little rest.
Fanshaw. 
Thither, where sinners may have rest, I go.
Pope. 
The grave, where ev’n the great find rest.
Pope. 
The midnight murderer
Invades the sacred hour of silent rest.
Anonym. 

5. Cessation from bodily labour.There the weary be at rest.
Job iii. 17. 




Wednesday, 10 September 2025

Building my 18th Century Library

 I've long wanted a lovely, permanent home for all my eighteenth century stuff and now I have my own house, I've managed to create that room of my desires. Here is how I did it and how I organised it.






Wednesday, 3 September 2025

"You've done this many times before"... a useful mantra from an odd place.


 “You’ve done this many times before, this is just one of those times.”

The above quote is a line spoken a number of times in Craig Warner’s theatrical adaptation of Patricia Highsmith’s novel, Strangers on a Train. It’s first said by Charles Bruno but becomes repeated by Guy Haines, a mantra between them. I’ve read the novel, but only after having read the play many times to learn the lines, I can’t find it there, it might be a play only addition.

The play version of Charles Bruno is a more pathetic person than the novel version - at the very least, his hold over Guy Haines is less strong - but the line is an example of Bruno being something of the master manipulator he thinks he is. At the point it’s introduced, he’s been sending Guy daily letters reiterating the exact steps he should take to kill Bruno’s father. The notion being that Guy has rehearsed the steps so often by reading the letters, the actual act should be no different.


Of course, if Guy had a backbone, he’d send the letters to the police and use it as proof of Bruno’s murderous intentions but he doesn’t, so he obsessively reads them instead. There is something psychologically powerful in repeating and reiterating the instructions again and again, something which makes it inevitable that Guy will follow them. It reminds me of the Roman stoics who would rehearse the worst outcomes of an event so they would be ready for them if they occurred.


It’s also an interesting line to have in a play. As someone playing Guy, I’ve read those lines multiple times, said them aloud in rehearsals and will say them over again during the play’s run. In a very real sense, when I ‘kill’ Bruno’s father on the fifth night of the run, I’ll have done it ‘for real’, (at least for an audience invested in the action) four times before. Poor Bruno’s father, he never appears on stage but is killed over and over again.


Weirdly, it’s a line that has been playing in my head a lot this week, both in reference to the play and in reference to going back to work at a school. This is my 17th new year and I find going back after the summer holidays as much as I ever did. There’s something comforting in remembering that I’ve done it many times before and that this is just one of those times. It also helps with the play, although I’ve learned the lines, I don’t feel like I have. They are all in there and come out when the scenes play, but if I were to sit down and try to cold remember them, it’s like they’re not there - but I’ve successfully got through the scenes many times before, tonight will be just one of those times. 


It also applies to my writing and this blog. A little hour snatched after school and before rehearsal is the only time I have to write this and it wasn’t till this morning that I had any idea of what I wanted to write about. I always think of something though. I’ve written a blog post many times before, this is just one of those times - I should trust myself.


And it might not be the finest entry on this blog, but it’s something, and something relevant to the art of writing and my life at this moment. It’ll do anyway.


Next week I perform the play and then after that, I won’t be doing it any more. I’ll probably miss it then.